Can A Copyright On Coaching Be Ignored And Adopted As A “free Lance Coaching Method” If No Official Objects?

Dear David Hendon
Being such a prolific snooker writer­ to so many outlets I hope this info’ is not kept­ “in house”.That was very devious Clive,­ giving such a lame excuse for your dismissal from the­ BBC. They wanted a Harry Worth.
You became complacent­ Clive in commentary’s: The reason the cue ball­ didn’t reach the cushion was: The ball was not hit­ hard enough!
And two shots later: The reason the cue­ ball hit the cushion and went round the green that time­ was: The cue ball was hit too hard.
These expressions­ Clive are less than ponderous; even to the “fool­ from Goole”. Joe Davis was snookers first coach,­ Mr­ Copyright,
Joe reinvented the game and indirectly­­ created many multi-million pound industries that­­ depended solely on the Joe Davis coaching methods.
­ Joe­ was one of three remarkable characters. A very­ liberal­ and generous person, a wrongly advised person­ that­ could not take advice, or a duped person­ subjected to­ “early day muggers”.
Joe Davis in­ today’s (me) culture; Joe­ would be Mr WPBSA and Mr­ Original and definitely a Lord of the Realm for­ creating a completely new industry and millions of jobs­ worldwide.
The fact that, the Joe Davis © method­ “got lost” in the “Public Domain” must be a­ great relief to many snooker bandits, especially Terry­ with his diplomas for sale business in Wales.
W/S­ should launch an enquiry into the disappearance of the­ Joe Davis copyright. The great mans family name and the­ “Game of Snooker” and the country has lost­ Royal Recognition.
PS Was Joe or his rep’ invited­ to the tobacco table?